Considerations in healthcare epidemic-outbreak management metrics
Are healthcare sector workers sufficiently trained? Are they suitably numbered for the load they are expected to handle?
A review of past and present healthcare worker reactions on social media suggests we have overlooked or underestimated or perhaps not even included the right gauge of analysis.
Emergency management systems in healthcare institutions need improvement:
The idea behind establishing an Emergency Management System in healthcare institutes is to prevent and control emergencies effectively, as well as to reduce the negative impact of the emergency on the healthcare workers.
Its design will generally have four stages:
Risk assessment regularly. Will analyze the requirement of medical equipment in the case of any emergency.
incident response to initial plans for an emergency.
capacity recovery carries out work like cleaning the environment.
adjustment and improvement-Review all phases and carry out adjustments and improvement work.
Healthcare workers in emergency EMR have been visibly overwhelmed throughout the pandemic.
The budget allocated to protect healthcare professionals and patients in emergencies was found to be in desperate need to make the patient care sufficient and also to spare healthworkers the mental and physical exhaustion that can lead to serious team decision-making risks.
And so, there is no doubt that coronavirus outbreaks have taught us that healthcare institutions need to treat their staff and patients in emergencies with much more support tools and resources, including financial compensation for the families of workers who are also affected.
A sustainable supply chain program should be established.
During the 2020 outbreak, many hospitals faced shortage of adequate medical supplies. Public hospitals are referred to as medical institutions for epidemic disease control and one of the primary concerns was contamination. If hospitals themselves face a shortage of medical supplies and have no capacity to treat incoming patients, they lose the definition of their institutional premise and validity to respond as society expects. It is therefore imperative that a maximum of sustainability decision-making priorities be established for hospital supply chain and related programmes.
Enhancing the development of telemedicine and wearable devices
Medical institutes which offer online diagnostic consultations due to the pandemic have been extremely helpful. This has relieved pressure on medical services who were checking patients physically on-site. The online medical facility is however still in the early stages of development and some emphasise that it should be enhanced after outbreaks have stopped, accordingly. Wearable devices are available for people with chronic diseases such as for therapeutic intervention but, there are concerns that more research is needed to ensure safety optogenetically to patients who suffer psychiatric related disorders.
A comprehensive health management system for business.
The spread of COVID-19 is still intense. It has led to economic lay-offs as many companies and officers are forced to cut back on business budgets and close their shops or offices.
For this reason, De 7 Provinciën(™) Corporate Compliance Certification offers an ideal analysis to prevent virus attracting sources and therby ensure environments that are stable and sustainable for re-opening businesses.
Build a national health data platform:
Updating records of the number of patients and number of deaths on a real-time basis have been challenging. It was reportedly difficult for the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to get health data of any person admitted to hospital and those who were infected and afraid to seek help.
A national health platform that successfully interconnects all information sources will require mobility where medical experts can quickly approach, diagnose and treat patients and mainstream the data to a national or federal observatory.
We believe that everyone should have a pandemic-free(™) life and we look forward to providing De 7 Provinciën(™) Corporate Compliance Certifications to support this, globally.
Infection prevention and control of epidemic
Health-care differences include wide variations ranging from patient-access, treatment facilities and even the ability to prescribe appropriate life-saving education. Health-care institutional administrative executive decisionmaking are largely responsible within conditions that are also varied across regional, State or national and international health policies. And so the control of epidemics and pandemics can become quickly complex and inconsistent when based on solutions solely targeting the victims. At De 7 Provinciën(™), we provide solutions that remove the threat to victims in the landscape of commercial enterprise, altogether - right from the monitoring and detection starting point. This represents the environment that contains and sustains the interaction of humans as part of the organization and within its boundaries, too. We believe that this is the most logical and efficient way ot prevent outbreaks, without burdening the human victim with more costs, more risks and more work.
However, it is the responsibility of executive and regional policy-makers in health administration departments and agencies to accept that human-based solution targeting is neither sustainable nor medically valid in the long-term. This is because it becomes verily more complex and difficult to identify solution strategies with increasing outbreaks over and over again.
By contrast, true cost-effectiveness ratios of the blocking of all outbreaks will have tremendous gain potential plus long term sustainability. It is the perfect union of spot-cleaning with security, so to speak and provides multidimensional shared cultural adoptability into the framework of improved social liberation - all without risk of disease outbreak. Infection prevention that is based on such freedom is important for renewed economic security. Business organizations can innovate within meaningful environments under our pandemic-free(™) compliance certification not only for their better business security but also for the rewards it gains from public awareness.
Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) for Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) principles are already deeply embedded in pandemic disease control . In host oriented approaches, it focuses only on the human victim, such as:
Patient recognition at an early stage at a rapid rate.
Standard IPC precautions applications for all patients;
Additional precautions for selected patients based on their presumptive diagnosis
building an IPC infrastructure for the health-care facility active in supporting IPC
activities.
Accordingly, it also requires all health care facilities to follow IPC strategies based on
Early detection and controlling the source,
Administrative controls,
Environmental and engineering controls, and personal
Protective equipment (PPE).
These are not sustainable in a pandemic such as COVID19 that lasts a minimum of 15 years and up to 50 because of the lack of environmental sustainable pandemic-free decisions with the virus interaction in the environment in all aspects.
Let’s look more closely at the approach that is done by the majority of health care settings to respond to infection, to-date:
1. Visible recommendation of early detection of infected humans.
Already Infected patients are considered wrongly to be the main cause of spread of infections and so the early capture and reporting of infected persons is thought to prevent other patients and health care staff from getting infection likewise. But this has not proven true. INfections that are virus based are the majority of eventual cancers. Cancers from such viruses are not contagious between humans. From this perspective, we can also see that spread has not been stopped or increased around immediate persons in close contact- except when food sources and/or toilets were shared, especially in the same location.
The method of reducing and preventing infection including promoting respiratory hygiene does not successfully prevent spread of diseases that are gastroenteric, such as SARS-CoV-2. Early detection and investigation, instant implementation of IPC measures, reporting and surveillance, and treating that infectious patient certainly helps - but not removing or isolation.
2.Administrative controls
We urge full hospital support for victims, more than prophylactic vaccination during a pandemic in particular. This is part of a good anti-contamination strategy for health-care facility management to ensure that no new strains are triggered by vaccination of mass populations. Unfortunately, this has not been done and mass vaccinations have triggered new strains accordingly. Virus infections are severe enough to be considered assaults. They are just as dramatic. And so, infections deserve all available resources for implementation of IPC symptom prevention. These resources can be
Establishing sustainable IPC infrastructures
Strict policies on early detection of ARIs
Quick access to laboratory testing for identification of the etiologic agent
Implementing appropriate IPC measures
Ensuring proper provision of regular supplies and services.
3.Environmental and engineering controls
Environmental and engineering controls targets to reduce the spread of infectious
are not necessarily by masking respiratory aerosols or biopathogens that may be mixed with airborne pollutant volatiles. Some of the common examples of primary engineering controls for infectious respiratory aerosols include
Proper environmental ventilation and
Social separation maintaining a distance of at least 1 m between two patients.
In our De 7 Provincien(™) Pandemic-Free(™) Compliance Certification, environmental ventilation is just as important as removing the sources that attract virus in the first place. Moreover the ventilation must not be downstream of infection-generating pathogens from neighbouring activities that might be located outside of the organization boundaries. Airborne routes for diseases such as pulmonary TB, measles and chickenpox serve as examples.
Other infections such as those that are communicable and spread by human oro-faecal contact can be reduced by changes in lifestyle but they do not necessarily represent sources of pandemic or epidemic spread. In fact, some of these can enable infection-resistance particularly in triggering microbial immunity responses that kill deadly food-borne pathogens . And so, human communication exposure therefore should NOT be eliminated by prolonged social distancing.
4.Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Personal protective equipment is considered effective at reducing the risk of transmission of respiratory pathogens especially for health-care workers and other people who come in contact with the patients in the health-care facility.
However, this is not true for fabric and plastic, or even rubber latex.
Personal protective equipment made from these materials do not prevent viruses from passing through.
They are also manufactured in environmentally-toxic assembly with glues and volatile chemicals that can be dangerous to humans in all-day exposure and handling. A PPE kit is generally defined for very short-term use and high disposability which is disappointingly inappropriate if the materials do not effectively represent disease prevention by mutual transmission. In fact, healthcare workers who are exposed to the same risk as hospital visitors have died, despite the PPE. This implies, once again, that the best policies and strategies are not by maintaining isolation guidelines and cover ups but rather a focus on the side of the environment and prevention of the virus source in the first place.
We believe in our strategies and our programs on behalf of the De 7 Provinciën(™) organization philosophy. Our Pandemic-Free (™) Corporate Compliance Certification focuses on principles of virus ecology which we selected to maximize evidence of outbreak prevention within 100 days. All these control strategies should be followed to work in an institution with a strict culture of safety.
What is ISO Certification & Other Frequently Asked Questions?
ISO stands for International Organization for Standardization. It refers to a seal of approval from a third party that a company is following all international standards developed and published by the ISO.
The ISO is an independent, international organization (not run by the government) that hires experts from different industries to share knowledge and develop international standards supporting innovation and provide solutions to combat global challenges.
Here are some of the Frequently Asked Questions by some of our clients:
What is the cost of ISO Certification?
The cost of ISO Certification varies. It depends on the internal resourcing capabilities of an organization, documentation of pre-existing management systems, and the size of organization size and scope of their products and services. The overall costs of ISO certification include the cost of the Certification Body and the cost of the consultant.
How much time is needed to get ISO 9001 Certification?
It is a three-month process where;
Month 1 is dedicated to the Development phase of an organization.
Month 2 is for Implementation
Month 3 involves Internal audit & management review
If Fast ISO Certification is required, it can be possible but certain factors may impact the timeframe. Click here on ISO certificates for more information.
How to get ISO 9001 Certification?
ISO 9001 Certification involves three simple steps
Step 1 Development phase for building a Quality Management system(QMS) documentation.
Step 2 Implementation phase involves the Implementation of the Quality Management System as per documents.
Step 3 Internal Audit includes a Complete internal audit and a management review meeting.
Once all three steps are completed, you can hire an authorized Certification body to conduct a certification audit.
What does ISO 9001 Certification mean?
An ISO 9001 Certification is a certificate for a company that has completed a third-party assessment audit of its QMS as per guidelines set by the ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems.
Who can give ISO Certification?
ISO Certifications are given by the companies called Certification Bodies. Only authorized (by Accreditation Body) Certification Bodies can give this certification.
Are there chances of fake ISO Certificates?
Yes. There are so many fake organizations claiming to offer genuine ISO certificates. So, it is very important to check if the Certification Body you hire to get ISO certification is legitimate or not.
What is ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems (QMS)?
ISO 9001 contains a list of rules and guidelines set by experts from all over the world. The list states rules that a business must follow to have an effective QMS.
You can highlight all the products and/or services offered by your company that meet eligibility.
You can sell products and/or services following laws.
If anything wrong happens, you are ready to improve. If you don’t fix the problem, appropriate action must be taken against you.
How often do you need to get this ISO Certification?
ISO Certificates given by the authorizing bodies are valid for three years. The Certification Body completes an initial Audit in the first year of certification, then take a Surveillance Audit in the second and third year.
How to Select the Right Certification for You and Your Organization
There are many certifications that can be pursued and obtained for one’s organization.
Determining which are needed and their upkeep can be tedious and time-consuming.
Questions need to be answered so that the resources to procure appropriate certifications is well prepared en advance.
One or multiple certifications?
From entry level certification to multi-faceted high-security and technology certifications, each depends on the scope of application and industry.
Academic or non-academic certifications?
Understanding the importance of certifications before you choose it is very important.
85% of IT professionals tend to obtain certification in just one or another program because this enables readiness to obtain immediate employment or contracts that may be more lucrative in a constantly changing field. On the other hand, formal academic training and a degree implies expert level capabilities including at the executive level of responsibility. And so, academic credentials stand out as better than non-academic certification for most. Still, it does not mean that ongoing training is less important.
On the contrary, regular specialization certification boosts value to your skills widely.
The advantages of doing a certification can understand in two ways: it adds value to an individual and also adds value to the organization.
Choose your path for the right certification
Hopefully, you know the importance of doing a certification by now. It's time to pick the right path. You must ask yourself “What do you want to achieve?”
Do you want to do the certification to make more money?
Do you want to upgrade your skills and knowledge?
Do you want to learn a new skill?
Make sure you have a definite answer.
Work on your area of interest
In our school and college days, all of us have loved some of the subjects and hated many. The subjects that we loved were the ones that we were interested in. The same rule applies to doing certifications. Pick a certification that interest you.
Even if you don’t find any area interesting, you can do the certification and maybe you start loving it. With that said, it’s always a good idea to become a master of a skill that you don’t know.
Don’t forget to do your homework
Have you ever purchased anything without checking about it on the Internet?
Have you ever brought a new server without gaining complete knowledge about it?
Have you hired anyone for a position without taking his or her interview?
Hopefully, the answer to all of these questions is a big “NO”.
The same principle holds for certifications. Don’t forget to do your homework. Gather as much information as you can about the certification you are interested in before spending your money.
Think about your plans and choose your certification accordingly.
Once you complete one certification, stay connected and try to do another. This will give you an ample of opportunities to learn and earn while getting certified.
This brief document is intended for mainstream audiences.
For advanced and executive industry decisions, please enquire about Pandemic-Free(™) Compliance Certification that is a new and specific type of industry certificate for business and institutional organizations provided exclusively by De 7 Provinciën(™).
Why all businesses must embrace environmental and social sustainability
Business development strategies are all about choices that lead to benefits.
In general, there is no hard and fast rule on those choices.
The same can be said about environmental and social sustainability.
The best solution will vary from company to company and institution to institution but, the care established in making the choice will be based on achieving visible evidence-based results.
Here are some of the guidelines typically used in management choice-making and whether or not they are effective enough to demonstrate evidence of environmental and social sustainability:
Maintain a priority of sustainability in strategy:
A corporate balanced approach towards sustainability objectives should be well established. We don’t want only waste-efficiency nor do we want the loss of innovation. The transition to fully pandemic-free(™) survival goals of our company De 7 Provinciën(™) within sustainability terms does just that. By comparison, some company’s such as Unilever’s “Sustainable Living” plan only an ambition to decouple growth, output, and lessen the carbon footprint and mainly by reducing waste, managing efficiency of resources These do not represent sustainability type innovation, or protection of ecological balance by industries who might be extremely waste-efficient already but toxic to the environment. And so prioritization of sustainability is a comprehensive self-standing solution that produces visible results that mere waste-management and internal industrial efficiency does not.
Pandemic-free(™) Compliance should be a priority in investment and insuring a business: The First and foremost priority of a company should be to comply with the pandemic-free(™) standards in its competitive field. Businesses that simply find a location or infrastructure or operational strategies that are in locations which are anti-sustainable industrial neighbourhoods will be grossly unable to achieve outcomes that are pandemic-free (™).
Proactiveness is the key: Many companies like Nike, Coca-Cola, Telenor, IKEA, Siemens, and Nestlé have come forward to support environmental sustainability. But Nike was boycotted because of public anger for following abusive labor practices in areas like Indonesia in the 90s. This violated social sustainability of the region. The company changed its policies and turned out to be a winner in 2005 but, it has not done so with any of its material resource standards as part of the fashion industry. This needs to change including as it, and all others, are guided towards a circular economy. Circular economies represent a reward in that they protect and prevent abandonment of goods that can trigger conditions for pandemics aggressively.
Quantify the return on sustainability. All companies find it hard to quantify the return on their investments in sustainability. According to our certification compliance for business and institutional organizations, the process is made simpler by comparing the most pandemic-free(™) choices for all key operations, events and development conditions. These include location of infrastructure relative to the surrounding environment, waste and water processes, foods and the kinds of materials that prevent virus accumulation in sources that are unsuitable for the green deal standard in trade. In turn, a pandemic-free compliance certification with De 7Provinciën protects business competitive advantage. Companies will see the link between sustainability standards in their business case that can be used in brokering business financial worth based on promotion of their pandemic-free(™) compliance.
Transparency is important. Transparency is one of the pre-conditions for government and investment integrity. It is as simple as that you can’t judge any business without transparency. Transparency in the business executive decisions ensures trust in how it respects the rights of its workers, its staff, its clients and its neighbours and future generations to enjoy a healthy environment. Transparency in our monitoring data as part of the pandemic-free certification is the only way companies can demonstrate and communicate their actions and choices are sincere to the priorities of good sustainable business.
Involve the Board: According to the latest survey by MIT/BCG, 86% of respondents should play a key role in sustainability. But, only 42% reported that their company is engaged in it. Boards often hesitate to engage key stakeholders like NGOs, governments, and international Organizations.
Consider microbial ecosystems as the cutting-edge value of executive vision: Collaboration is very important for following sustainability practices efficiently. The MIT/BCG data shows that 67% of executives believe that sustainability is an area where collaboration should be mandatory.
Incorporate the organization broadly: Using the example of Salesforce.com, a program of “1/1/1” in philanthropy program contributes is equivalent to motivating high personal engagement per employee in the corporate pandemic-free(™) success, and its representation of environmental sustainability at heart. This inspires respect from the local community and related earth and health committees at the ground root level.
Concluding words: Sustainability is a major priority in the environment and social lifestyle of today. But, pandemic-free(™) environments and lifestyles prove far more the perfectly tangible and efficient metric of both for business organizations globally.
Environmental Sustainability: Research Growth and Trends
It all begins with an idea.
2021 is a new decade that barely enjoys a moment of peace from 2020’s intense activism, financial losses, and sweeping harsh government policies designed to force zero-spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus as much as possible. A large number of CEOs, policymakers, and buyers realize have surprisingly accepted the new landscape as if the hope will be based on demonstrating prioritization of increasing social and ecological protection, especially in the benefits they offer to protect against further disease and further loss of resources and the blundering of our present system into complete collapse.
For the first time in a century of industry, we now see organizations non-resistant to solving the world's difficulties by changing their own processes. If so, this offers the opportunity to open doors in every nation for very new and unprecedented developments, including in what defines a market share with long-term sustainability rewards, support of green-innovations, and investment that is dedicated to preventing climate change in word and action.
The World Economic Forum's Davos Manifesto, agrees, “a bunch of moral standards [are needed] to manage organizations in the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution."
Increasing numbers of publications put the call for environmental and social sustainability on the top of the agenda such as the World Economic Form of 2020 (#WEF20) , trends that will bring more business in 2021.
Responsible leaders carry the responsivity of driving actions for Sustainable Development Goals
It will take 10 years to reach the 2030 goal set by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The current lifestyle is unsustainable , and beyond the limits of capacity of the earth terrestrial survival. A compromise is needed, so that we change without hurting ourselves further. This means, we must ask ourselves, ‘What have we learnt?’ and to think about our choices and goals.
Business plays a crucial part of the lessons , particularly in the last century which triggered much of the short-chang of environmental stability we took for granted. Industrial business ventures impact the environment very greatly where there are no circular re-use policies.
Converting sustainability strategy to transformation is important.
Incorporating sustainability decision making into outcomes for corporate strategy is important to address the impacts on local environments, not just its competitiveness. Some people hardly know that the products or services they use are deleterious to the environment.
Sustainable finance is the main subject.
Stakeholders finally accept the need to shift from short-term goals to long-term, and that this requires “sustainable capital”, a term that qualifies risk-return paradigm based on how much benefit to sustainability every simple investment capital brings to the environment.
China to green the global economy.
The European countries and the US countries cannot take significant initiatives without taking help from China. China is the second-largest contributor to the United Nations and it needs to join the green targets particularly in its industrial exploits that have significantly damaged local air quality to impossible breathing states of deterioration.
The next generation is expected to influence family enterprises and this is a huge boost to the increased social-environmental sustainable success
We know that majority businesses globally are in fact, family enterprises. As such, they contribute to two-thirds of the global GDP and reliable income and work in the long-term market. Therefore, such enterprises play a considerable role in addressing some of the most trending challenges faced by the world.
Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) to bring together sustainability and digitization
The rise of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) focuses on using digital technologies to promote ethical and sustainable business strategies.
Social digital responsibility including organizations' practices revolves around the privacy of customers and employees and certain aspects of digital diversity and inclusion. This is visible in new government actions on behalf of correcting gross bias in artificial intelligence (AI). More needs to be done to prevent abuse of AI in which multiple drugs are generated with ideal clinical trial successes for targeted healthy members of the population but which are not necessary and which present environmental risks that are not included in clinical trials by private manufacturing pharmaceutical investments.
Change in habits of the fashion and luxury goods industry
Part of the current lifestyle includes the fashion industry which is responsible for 10% of greenhouse emissions. It is not the most conductive to disease outbreaks but it compromises resources that are essential for sustainability, particularly in its extremes of plastic, toxic dyes and savage consumption of animals solely for disposable very short-term products. As the number of customers of this industry grows, so too the impact of the industry on the environment and risk of damage to ecological diversity. Burberry for example, burnt a large stock of its unsold clothes in 2017 due to which this brand had to face a serious backlash. To this day, more needs to be done by major fashion and cosmetic brands and their magazine-related promoters to stop promoting an unsustainable lifestyle.
We target the most immediate and important sources of outbreak disease threats.
Ask us to outline examples in your organization.
We provide training and monitoring, as well as certification so that results are visible within 100 days.
Green Deal: the key to a climate-neutral and sustainable EU and US
It all begins with an idea.
The European Parliament has launched a Green Deal-core strategy as a part of the government’s health and economic sustainability goal. It is also viewed as substantially beneficial for the COVID-19 economic recovery too. We describe how the deal is expressed as a climate-neutral European future.
At the present time of writing, the coronavirus pandemic has clobbered the economy, and yet, it also reduced the high level of carbon emissions. The former left the EU dealing with an inevitable economic recession while the latter boosted the awareness of impact that previous rates of carbon gases and industrial air toxicity had impacted our lifetime -particularly for asthmatic patients and those with skin and respiratory impairments. And so a resolution was adopted on 15 May 2020 by the Parliament that called for an ambitious COVID-19 recovery project with GreenDeal at its center.
In response to the resolution, the European Commission initiated the Next Generation EU, a €750 billion recovery plan for COVID-19. The recovery plan and the long-term budget (needs approval) by member states and Parliament, to create a greener, more inclusive, digital, and sustainable Europe increasing resilience to expected crises like climate crisis.
However, in 2019, Parliament had already declared a Climate Emergency and requested the Commission to frame its proposal considering a 1.5 °C target for reducing global warming ensuring reduction in emission of greenhouse gases.
Responding to that, the Commission came up with European Green Deal, a European road map to become a climate-neutral continent by 2050.
And now we have what is considered a powerful first step of the Green Deal in place. It can be described as powerful for the following reasons:
Finance
At the beginning of 2020, the Commission highlighted the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan, to finance the Green Deal by collecting €1 trillion from public and private investment over the next 10 years.
In Mid-2020, the Commission proposed a loan facility for the public sector to support green investment in areas that depend on fossil fuels.
Achieving climate neutrality goal
In March 2020, the Commission proposed the European Climate Law, a legal entity to reach the neutrality goal by 2050. Parliament called for more projects aimed at reducing emissions.
Parliament adopted its EU climate Law, in October 2020, following the 2050 climate neutrality goal and achieving a 60% target by 2030.
Empowering EU industries and SMEs to join
In March 2020, the Commission proposed an Industrial strategy to ensure that European businesses consider climate neutrality on priority. In November 2020, Parliament revised the proposal reflecting the impact of the pandemic.
Enforcing the EU circular economy
The commission also proposed the EU Circular Economy Action plan that revolves around the entire life cycle of products focusing on the circular economy, enhancing sustainable consumption, and assuring less waste. The plan focuses on:
batteries and vehicles;
construction and buildings;
Electronics and ICT;
packaging and plastics;
textiles; and
the food chain.
Motivating an accelerated sustainable food system
The food sector is one of the main sectors responsible for climate change. Some people believe that EU agriculture is the only sector responsible for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 20% since 1990. It still creates 10% of emissions out of which 70% is caused by animals.
Highlighting full ecological biodiversity programmes as essential
EU aims to preserve biodiversity by working on the extinction of one million species. As per the EU's Biodiversity strategy for 2030, the commission will work together to protect nature. Its main objective include:
Increase in protected areas;
Reversing the dropping pollinations.
planting more than three billion trees by 2030, and;
saving €20 billion per year for biodiversity.
Developing infectious disease surveillance systems
It all begins with an idea.
The ongoing pandemic disease has taught us many lessons about change.
But are these lessons helpful to prevent subsequent outbreaks of the virus ?
Various publications have suggested that they can. For example, National Institute of Health, (USNIH) , John Hopkins Research Institute, Nature (R) publication Communications offer support and information about how national and international systems could be molded to increase their readiness against local or global epidemics.
The largest volume of scientific publications shared research that reacted to early detection of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, as if recommending to develop a solution via neutralizing monoclonal antibodies.
Much of it assumed aerial transmission of the virus present based on animal infectivity experimentally. The assumption also led to the promotion of mouth and nose masks as effective solutions to prevent spread. However these promotions by Nature and other publications were not necessarily accurate.
We offer a platform and tools to show that human infectivity and spread has nothing to do aerial exposure but rather strictly overwhelmed virus multiplication combined with targets that happen to be ingested by humans without public health warnings.
The exposure in this way is part of the pathway that virus infection of humans has been so profound. We provide the tools that can help to design policy and implement it to fight outbreaks within 100 days.
Data and digital tools such as artificial intelligence and machine learning cannot represent more than 40% of the accurate forecast. This is because the data that is used is already historical and less real by the time it is collected. And so, we are more interested in the instantaneous progression of change in the real environment and ensuring computational models do not store data to predict the future outbreaks.
To come up with an effective disease surveillance system and to fight against them, we need a green pro-ecological framework. Many research teams have devoted their attention to instances of events that describe interaction of the virus in the human host. None, such as at the World Health Organization (WHO) have dedicated their research to pandemic-related virus ecology. We are the leaders in that field and first to do so.
We are cutting-edge in a new forecasting field for technologists.
To show digital data and computational models related to the epidemic and control, the system compiles a Collection system we update regularly as part of monitoring for client organizations and institutions. It is essential to acknowledge that variables for new diseases are not predictable with traditional or even the best available methods in epidemiology. A system that responds quickly to an epidemic or pandemic threat needs to be integrated with a variety of societal components and environmental ones as well. The resulting output is a collection that is expected to suggest possible remedial responses that are precise to the solution for saving lives and the quality of life that each human expects in the answerability of their government to them. The US NIH, Nature Communications and multi-disciplinary teams around the world have offered an Open Access model on behalf of regular updates for key issues in the pandemic form. It has taught us about the need for reorganization of healthcare and hospital access, the need to qualify acceptable and unacceptable parts of the economy relative to sustainability, and the preparedness of cities and infrastructures for biopathogenic warfare.
For the future investigation, the products that we design are called ToolKits. The system is launched for discussion online interactively. Experts from different fields are invited to speak and to share their experience and contribution to the fight against COVID-19 and to share their views on how a new disease can change lives.
We too will bring more detailed information about mechanisms and dynamics of the strains that emerge, and describe that information to our audiences and clients. The new products give our client organizations the power to control liability against future pandemic outbreak risks. It includes the prediction of unknown and upcoming diseases. We work with new technology and consider the latest for computational purposes to do with genomic analyses, too But on the broad pandemic-free target, we are already extremely flexible enough to be integrated with hospital certification and environmental quality. Truly, what we learn helps us learn how much room there is for more experts and decision-makers that enhance the performance of our pandemic-free (™) certification models.
Wherever today’s confusion exists in decision-makers , guidance should be based on both modeling forecasts and real-time interaction insights on-site.
We hope this brief document inspires you to join us, and to share your research on pandemic disease on our site.
Infectious disease pandemic planning and response
It all begins with an idea.
Proper planning is an important part of reducing the chances of potentially catastrophic infectious disease from spreading in society. Such a statement is easier said than done.
During a pandemic, preparatory readiness is delayed by doubts and disbelief which wastes valuable time. As well, the lack of prior experience leaves uncertainty and no guidelines for optimum decision making.
In the H1N1 pandemic in 1918 millions of people died worldwide.
The decimation was simultaneous with changes in the environment, before and after.
In the meantime, vaccines and antivirals are touted today as thorough they reduce the impact of any type of epidemic disease related to a virus- including past viruses. However, this is not consistent with the nature of virus ecology. Virus ecology helps viruses to change whenever the host has changed. Vaccines can not block or destroy viruses, including in 100% vaccination of animals and humans. In other words, outbreaks epidemics and pandemics will always occur, including with what are described as new strains of the same virus, in order to fulfil its ecological mission and goal.
Many cities are connected by air travel, so there are chances that pathogens can spread by air travel.
However, this has not been the case between species but only between confined and massively-reproduced unsustainable animals, as in the H1N1 pandemic that hit the nation in 2009 and spread rapidly to 74 countries in 4 months. This is because animal farming is faster than sustainable farming and animals on farms which are slaughtered trigger the attraction of deadly viruses when there is a suitable environmental condition before-, during or after.
A mathematical model with statistics can be helpful in planning strategies to deal with a pandemic and how to respond but not always. We see mistakes in models that forecasted lockdowns in Ile, France would help reduce spread. In fact, this was not so . The models used statistical inferences based on a constant linear rate and no relationship to virus multiplication in specific kinds of hosts that were ingested by their human victims. The rate of spread was also not correlated to environmental conditions that are a necessary part of virus multiplication. And so France used its incorrect model-based statistical forecast to carry out an ineffective lockdown that did not stop outbreaks. If anything, the severity of the subsequent outbreaks increased during lockdowns which somehow inspired health ministers to suggest more aggressive isolation including of children from their families and more surgical day-long masks, including those that have evidence to trigger lung carcinoma and while virus density concentrations are thick enough to pass through fabric, skin, brick, rubber and even plastic wrapping. The problem with statistics to-date in the publications shows no relationship to virus ecology and for that reason, it is driven only by transient detection of disease symptoms, typically much too late or with tests of saliva that are also not related to the location of SARS infectivity, the small intestine. When or where the next pandemic will occur is part of our goal so that each nation has the opportunity to know 7-10 days in advance where the next outbreak will register and to fight it effectively or even with laws to hold liable sources critically responsible. As part of a toolkit, forecasting epidemic outbreaks can be used to provide awareness and better understanding of the nature of the virus path in humans and to environmental and social sustainability.
Other interesting considerations: How does the model help in the current pandemic response policy?
In general, the pandemic preparedness and response models produced from these efforts can be broadly classified into two groups:
those aiming to inform situational awareness and
those aiming to understand the merits of possible interventions.
Modeling data can help to fight pandemics that are of known diseases. In 1973, Fox and partners portrayed the utilization of pandemic recreation models which were dependent on microorganism attributes similar to the ones seen in 1957 H2N2 and 1968 H3N2 to investigate the expected effect of mass immunization and school terminations. Environmentally, however, the models were not repeatable.
Many years later, modelers and strategy planners tried to use their strategies to reach flu A(H1N1)pdm09. By utilizing observation frameworks and computational force not accessible to their archetypes in 1968, a plethora of new model-dynamic concepts emerged. Some were created merely to give continuous appraisals of the pandemic effect level and adequacy of the best considered control measures.
It was thought that the development of flu A(H1N1)pdm09 vitally depended on versatility to advancing pandemic situations that were unknown at the time. Numerous international researchers tried to investigate the pathways that created a virus-outbreak situation emergent at vulnerable locations. Like all epidemics, the initial outbreak depended on infection. In this case, it depended on the more deadly HPAI H5N1 infections. By contrast, A(H1N1)pdm09 was relatively gentle and as such, it inspired nations to agree that a quick change was needed in the environment in order to prevent further outbreaks.
Other models, known as expert systems, triggered some suspicions about the models utilized in 2009 which had relied on pre-pandemic related models, but that did not show the same output forecasts. Since 2009, models have been progressively upheld as the ideal way to simplify monitoring and pandemic readiness planning. But has it? Today, in 2021, worldwide virus-related cancer and infection rates continue to rise, including the scourges of extreme intense respiratory conditions (SARS, 2002–2003) correlated to the intense and threatening effects of environmental climate deterioration. The rise of profoundly pathogenic avian flu (HPAI) infection H5N1 (2003), and the West African Ebola infection sickness plague (2013–2016), have also additionally not helped advances in pandemic readiness and reaction abilities- despite the promotion of models and their artificial intelligence.
Everything you should know about the coronavirus outbreak
It all begins with an idea.
COVID-19 was first detected in December 2019 in Wuhan city in China with a population of 11 million. The virus has now reached over 200 countries across the globe and was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020.
According to the latest reports, there are 97,830,595 lab-confirmed cases of this virus that killed 2,120,877. The cases still continue to rise internationally.
This article is an overview of public knowledge about the virus outbreak.
What is Coronavirus?
SARS-CoV-2 is a member of a single-stranded RNA family of viruses called coronaviridae, a common type of virus that attacks mammals, birds, and reptiles equally.
In humans, it causes infections like common cold, cough, and fever. The incubation period of this virus is up to two weeks.
The origin of this virus?
No information on its origin has been given far. Originally, it was believed that the virus originated from a food market in Wuhan and started from animal to human. Mammals like camels and bats have been held responsible for the previous coronavirus outbreaks, but the exact information is still not described. We assert that it began on August 12, 2018 or earlier but not later and in Kristianstad, Sweden.
How contagious is COVID-19?
It is suggested that the speed of infection is about 1.4 to 2.5 which means, each infected person can infect up to 1.4 and 2.5 people. We declare this false. The source of SARS-CoV-2 is spread in those who share the same food source and same wastewater facilities This is because the virus is a gastroenteric virus that begins infectivity in the gut, not the nose or mouth. Successful infection of a human via the gut, enables it to spread to the lungs and to the nervous system, including the brain , bypassing the blood brain barrier, via the peripheral nervous system.
How is the virus diagnosed?
This virus targets the small intestine and lower respiratory tract via ACE-2 and TMPRSS receptor sites that are the highest in volume in the epithelial mucosal layer. Common symptoms include dry cough and fever. Hyperinflammation leads to critical illness and fatal vulnerability.
What social distancing guidelines are being followed in the UK?
The government initiated its coronavirus action plan on 3 March 2020. On 16 March 2020, Prime Minister Boris Johnson and nations internationally in Europe announced social distancing guidelines like working from home, wearing a mask at public places, limiting social gatherings, washing hands often, etc.
What is happening with testing for COVID-19?
Anyone with symptoms can take tests in the local State or province. For example, in the UK, the NHS testing service was launched on May 28th, 2020 to test for coronavirus. Anyone with positive test results were required to share a travel history and self-isolation for at least 14 days - despite the fact that the virus density includes 100 decillion multiplying virion particles that are less than 150 micrometers every 60 seconds and that these particles saturate the environment most densely where raw farmed animal tissue is manufactured, collected and distributed.
At the moment, testing sites are available for healthcare home staff and residents in England.
But, because The faecal loads of the virus in farmers, and slaughterhouse workers and residents near animal slaughter are dangerously high and reveal the highest COVID19 source threat, we recommend that these are carriers who have not been isolated and that this is a serious flaw in public health safety decision making .
What should a healthcare staff do if a patient thinks he or she is COVID-19?
Patients can go to their nearest pharmacy if they think they are COVID-19 positive. Until the test report, they are advised to self-isolate for 10 days. We recommend against this because the contamination is already grossly spread and not from human sources. We recommend human evacuation and/or that the source be held liable and shut down immediately to prevent outbreaks.
What can be done to protect ourselves and the staff?
At present, community pharmacies are suggested to set strict measures to protect pharmacy staff and keep at least a 6 ft distance from staff members and the patients at the pharmacy. We advise radically effective solutions based on antigenic air quality at specific times and durations in the day that we can guarantee create a pandemic-free environment in any given workspace, including laboratory. We also do not recommend isolation except from confined farmed animals at slaughter environments.
We also recommend that hospitals and treatment technologies be a priority and not vaccinations. Vaccines disrupt the gut-brain licensing that is vital for human environmental responsiveness. Without this responsiveness, such as when it is blocked or impaired by antibodies and antibody-based vaccines, long-term impairments including obesity, allergy and lymphatic disorders develop as well as overcompensation by other hormonal signaling processes. The most serious of these is the loss of brain neuronal and glial cell growth. Viruses also evolve to overcome vaccine resistance effects such as via a glycan shell layer and new strains.
Virus related vaccines do not kill virus nor prevent reinfection and that repeated vaccination also has been found to leave inoculants with higher viral loads upon re-infection. And so, our solution which is an important feature of environmental sustainability and ecological measurement, ensures that virus outbreaks never happen in human populations - and that the need for pharmaceutical prophylactic vaccines is not justified. Environments that change mean diseases stop. We deliver that change in 100 days or less.